On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 09:39 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 16:20 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Hi Bastien Nocera!
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:48:02AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote next:
> >
> > > And again
> >
> > > --- gnokii.spec 29 Nov 2007 12:50:02 -0000 1.19
> > > +++ gnokii.spec 29 Nov 2007 13:47:30 -0000 1.20
> > > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
> > > xmandir=%{_mandir}/man1 docdir=/__docinst
> > >
> > > mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/__docinst .
> > > -rm __docinst/{README-MacOSX,README-WIN32,packaging-howto,ChangeLog,COPYING,COPYRIGHT,TODO,MAINTAINERS}
> > > +rm __docinst/{README-MacOSX,README-WIN32,ChangeLog,COPYING,COPYRIGHT,TODO,MAINTAINERS}
> > Why did you not use rm -f ?
I actually did in devel.
> If you use -f, the rm call will not fail, thus the cruft will likely
> stay in your spec file forever, even if it is not needed anymore.
>
> It is a bit like using excessive wildcards in your file list...
Yep. Hopefully, I'll be able to clean this mess up with the next version
of gnokii, once it's all nicely automake-ified.
Cheers
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
