On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 18:46 +0000, dexter wrote: > On Wed November 28 2007 17:36:49 Jesse Keating wrote: > > Just because the features are Enterprise > > focused doesn't mean they're automatically beta. > true > > It just means that > > the focus is more on Enterprise needs, which are often customer driven. > But when your mission is to focus on Enterprise(rhel) customers just before > they release it's not hard to see why people are saying fedora is beta for > rhel. I personally don't see how you'll drop this tag when you have a couple > of "Comunity focused" then a "Corporate focused" cycle. The difference is what _types_ of things are being worked on. ie, I don't think that there are a huge number of Fedora/community users out there clamoring for iSCSI support at install-time[1], but it was something that mattered for enterprise customers -- thus, it was one of the things that got a bit of my time in the FC6 cycle. Alternately, a lot of the work for the livecds, installing from the livecds, etc weren't things that matter for enterprise customers but are very import for Fedora. And that's where a lot of my time has been for F7 and F8. But that said, the features being done for the enterprise case _are_ relevant and interesting to some of the community and so benefit everyone. Jeremy [1] And the fact that it's been at least partially broken for most of the F7 and F8 cycles (with some late fixups) without anyone noticing helps to support this claim :-) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
