On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Jesse Keating wrote:
Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What is the reasoning for needing to bump something else beside the
epoch? As far as I'm concerned, epoch is the most significant part of
the "combined version" of a package -- isn't that the case?
The most basic example, if you just bump epoch and nothing else, the
resultant file name is no different than the previous file name. You
can't store the two builds in the same directory, and it's quite
confusing.
More importantly, wouldn't the CVS tag be the same, too? That's a big
show-stopper.
Jima
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
