On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 13:30 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 13:10 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:49 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >>>> To put it shortly, I going to switch the default rpm queryformat to
> >>>> include package architecture (ie what you get now with
> >>>> rpm -q --qf "%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n") in a few days or
> >>>> so.
> >>>
> >>> Not %{name}-%|epoch?{%{epoch}:}|%{version}-%{release}.%{arch} ? :)
> >>
> >> FWIW, upstream rpm.org now uses this as the default queryformat and
> >> supports it in queries etc:
> >> [pmatilai@localhost rpm]$ ./rpmq -q gimp-2:2.4.1-1.fc8.x86_64
> >> gimp-2:2.4.1-1.fc8.x86_64
> > -1
> >
> >> The epoch is the most significant factor in version comparison, might as
> >> well show it...
> > with this queryformat people now will start bitching on why they can't
> > find a file of this name - the same applies to "all small letters file
> > names".
>
> I'm changing the default filename too to match this, for this very reason.
Pardon, but now you are going too far - You have driven things into
absurdity.
Ralf
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
