Re: New dependency in Fedora 8 - metacity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 10:18 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 10:33 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > We could depend on gnome-wm instead, but that isn't likely to make
> > anyone happier than just requiring metacity.  Or we could require miniwm
> > from anaconda, which isn't actually a terrible idea, but you'd have to
> > change the anaconda packaging first because you probably don't want to
> > drag in all of anaconda at runtime.
> 
> Only if someone else is willing to own mini-wm :-)  It has some ...
> "interesting" focus behaviors from time to time.  With only one app
> running, the effect is minimized but they still pop up from time to time
> and lead to some fun.

I don't have strong feelings one way or the other.  If it were up to me
metacity would simply be non-optional for Fedora.

But if you wanted to subpackage mini-wm and fix firstboot, I'd fix s-c-d
and occasionally look at the bugs for the subpackage.  And I'm happy to
tell people that it's not a real wm.

- ajax

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux