On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 10:18 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 10:33 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > We could depend on gnome-wm instead, but that isn't likely to make > > anyone happier than just requiring metacity. Or we could require miniwm > > from anaconda, which isn't actually a terrible idea, but you'd have to > > change the anaconda packaging first because you probably don't want to > > drag in all of anaconda at runtime. > > Only if someone else is willing to own mini-wm :-) It has some ... > "interesting" focus behaviors from time to time. With only one app > running, the effect is minimized but they still pop up from time to time > and lead to some fun. I don't have strong feelings one way or the other. If it were up to me metacity would simply be non-optional for Fedora. But if you wanted to subpackage mini-wm and fix firstboot, I'd fix s-c-d and occasionally look at the bugs for the subpackage. And I'm happy to tell people that it's not a real wm. - ajax -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
