Re: Bug #372011 (or: how we could help with anaconda beta tests)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dmitry Butskoy wrote:

Not exactly. Old releases of Red Hat Linux was supported much more time rather than Fedora now.

Release cycle is different from updates cycle and IIRC the last couple of releases of Red Hat Linux wasn't supported much longer. Anyway the point is that ~ 6 month release cycle was adopted from Red Hat Linux.

Answer lies in rest of the upstream software including GNOME which follow this release schedule

BTW, what else significant besides GNOME?

Time based releases? Openoffice.org, Xorg, Linux kernel ...

But it seems intrusive anyway, because the user is compelled to switch to the new release fast enough...

You know it is going to a major decision compared to updates for a existing release. That visibility is important I think. There are other distributions that have been following a rolling release model. Source based: Gentoo.. Otherwise: Arch and a few others.

Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux