Re: rpms/pam_ssh/F-8 pam_ssh.te,NONE,1.1 pam_ssh.spec,1.13,1.14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 03:20:33PM +0300, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:

Maybe just check in %post and %postun whether the "semodule" binary is present (i.e., "[ -x /usr/sbin/semodule ] && ....")? Or use %triggerin for policycoreutils...

%triggerin should really be avoided.

But if the user will decide to use SELinux (install all needed packages) later? Then it should re-install pam_ssh to activate its policies...


Dmitry

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux