On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 19:45 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 22:27 +0530, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote: > >>> Like you said, the modified .star files can't be distributed, but the > >>> ADC data files are fine to package as is, under the "Redistributable, no > >>> modification permitted". > >> Does this mean I can have a package whose spec file generates the > >> .star file from the catalog, so that installing starplot-gliese3 > >> directly provides the .star file? (I think 'no'.) > > > > No, because we'd be distributing the .star files in that scenario. > > > > What about a %post generating them under /var/lib ? I know this ain't pretty > but I think it would solve the license issue. Hmm, normally I'm against this, but if they were ghosted in the %files, the package would "own" them, and we wouldn't actually be distributing them. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
