On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
Yes it's confusing and inconsistent behavior which I *really* want to get
rid of. It's just that this is not a simple matter of "fixing rpm" - our
package set is full of conflicting files. The package set needs fixing,
otherwise you'll have a very much uninstallable x86_64 (and to slightly
lesser effect ppc) tree.
Wouldn't fixing rpm early in the development cycle encourage more packages to
get fixed faster?
That's the very reason bug #190209 is being dusted off at the moment :)
- Panu -
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
