On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 06:05 -0500, David Woodhouse wrote: > Please don't top-post. I've corrected it this time... > > On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 00:49 -0200, Mauricio Pretto wrote: > > Braden McDaniel wrote: > > > Is it appropriate to file bugs for cases of (apparently unnecessary) > > > i386 packages that are installed by default as part of an x86_64 > > > installation of Fedora 8? > > > > > > If so, do these generally go against anaconda or the particular package? > > The bug already exists, as one of the deps of the multilib tracker bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235756 Thank you. -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <braden@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
