On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 07:53 +0000, Keith Sharp wrote: > I agree that a CalDAV compliant calendaring server would be a great > addition to Fedora, but is the Darwin Calendar Server the best one to > focus attention on? As far as I am aware there are at least three other > servers we could consider: > > http://www.bedework.org/bedework/ > http://chandlerproject.org/ > http://rscds.sourceforge.net/ > > I am not following development of any of these, so I cannot comment on > which would be best for Fedora, but it would be worth doing a review > before focusing on one implementation. > > Keith. > Keith, I had seen these before. I do not think I want chandler or rscds. The later doesn't fully implement the protocol yet. It may never do so. Chandler seems much too heavy. Bedework may be a win. It may actually be better than Darwin Calendar (which is what I suggested). Anyone have any ideas on which would be best? Trever -- "Life is what happens to you when you're busy making other plans." -- John Lennon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
