On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:46:38PM +0100, Joachim Frieben wrote: > > I personnally would prefer > > -both, Xaw3d the default > > to be able to use the Xaw interface if there are issues with Xaw3d, > > while having the Xaw3d as default to be tested. > > > > -- > > Pat > > Not consistent with the procedure in other cases like e.g. "xdvi" and "tetex-xdvi" which do use "Xaw3d" by default, and where an alternative "Xaw" build doesn't exist either. Wouldn't they be afflicted by hypothetical "Xaw3d" issues, too? Who knows. It is always better to have a fallback known to work. Moreover xfig is different from xdvi. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
