On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 22:38 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > >> So how do we *best* coordinate this? > > > > https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/bodhi/ticket/79 > > Yeah OK, so blocking updates which breaks deps is a good idea. But > will > this cause a catch 22-situation where I cannot push libmtp because if > I > do, I break Amarok, and I cannot push Amarok too, because it is > maintained > by Aurelien and I'm not allowed to push that. It could place the packages into an intermediate state where it will wait for all of them to be ready to be pushed, and then once they're all waiting, it pushes them all at once. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
