tis 2007-11-13 klockan 09:17 +0100 skrev Patrice Dumas: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:23:35PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > According to the FHS this would be the desired location so if it's > > desirable to change this is where I'd put it. Will it make integrating > > ltsp easier if the location is the same between Fedora and Ubuntu? > /srv is clearly the right location, but I agree that /var/lib/*/ is the > best location, if /srv/ is to be untouched by the packages (and I don't > have an opinion on that point). The current usage of /var/lib doesn't really follow FHS, but packages touching /srv is also against the FHS, so that's not right either. I think the best thing to do here is to violate the FHS the same way everything else is doing and use /var/lib/tftp or stay in /tftpboot if you're not comfortable with the former. It would be questionable to start violating the FHS in a new and shiny way, i.e. to use /srv/tftp. If packages are going to go into /srv there should be a structure to it. Btw, "lib/foo" is not about shared objects for foo, it's "here goes things belonging to foo", regardless of if it's /var/lib or /usr/lib. Don't be confused by "lib". Remember, this is Un*x, it's evolved, not logical. Do you think your genes are nicely commented and using pretty variable names? :) /abo -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
