Le Lun 12 novembre 2007 15:25, Matej Cepl a écrit : > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:12:43 +0100, Christopher Aillon scripst: >> But also keep in mind that much of the current package workflow has >> been defined by the limitations of CVS. Our current faux-branching >> scheme was in part done because of CVS, for example. >> [...] >> Returning to your original question, which I'll paraphrase as "what >> do >> we gain by moving away from CVS?" Not much. A small number of >> users >> will take advantage of the features that the new VCS gives them. > > I think the thing we need to loose is the box where we keep our work- > flow. So for example, could somebody explain why in the time or DVCSs > we > still have tarball-based packaging? Because that's a good auditing point. You have one fixed version state + patches, not a jumble where the distinction between what upstream provided and what Fedora added is blurred. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
