On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 23:38 +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 11/11/2007, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 11/11/2007, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What are the other of the "several" issues with the license? Could the > > > ex-package maintainer offer a bit more explanation? > > > > > > > Aha, a bit of digging leads to: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236309 > > > > which details the problems with itext licensing (on which pdftk > > depends). I guess the nuclear use is a small issue compared to the > > others :(. > > > > To continue the monologue, it seems itext upstream is now entirely > licensed as either LGPL 2 or MPL. As such, I can't see a reason it > can't be reinstated in Fedora. If someone points me at a new package for itext, I'd be happy to do a quick audit to confirm that it is OK for Fedora now. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
