Re: "Extension Buddy" for Fedora 9?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 07:17 -0500, Andrew Parker wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 6:46 AM, Ralf Ertzinger <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:38:59 +0100, Mark wrote:
> >
> > > So what do you think of it?
> > > good idea? bad idea?
> >
> > Usually the programs installed register a list of extensions they are
> > able to handle. audacious seems to miss the m3u extension, this is
> > a bug. Please file in bugzilla.
> 
> Sure, thats a bug, but what if audacious wasn't installed?  How would
> a user know what to install?
> 
> Would be nice if a user tried to open a file that didn't have an
> application associated with it and up popped a list of applications
> that could be installed.  Would be even cooler if the you could select
> one to install, it installed, then opened it up for you.

It would be cool if we could autoextract mime handling information from
desktop files installed in /usr/share/applications and generate
"mime(application/pdf)" style rpm provides.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux