On Nov 9, 2007 5:08 AM, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 11:48 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:55:08AM -0500, Kelly Miller wrote: > > > here). First of all, is there a preferred language for development > > > like this? I've actually done very little to no Python development > > > > Almost certainly Python. > > > > The key reason these utilties need rewriting is to separate the user > > They don't need rewriting, they need refactoring. There's too much logic > in the tools already to be able to make throwing it all away and > beginning from scratch feasible without breaking things. There's also a > lot of wheel-reinvention in the tools as they are today, i.e. a > potential for code consolidation between the tools. Agreed. We don't have time to do them from scratch, other tools need to be written: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SystemConfig/Missing I would like to see, and I am willing to work on, all these tools being able to function on remote machines via SSH. I can provide details of my idea if anyone is interested. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
