On Do November 8 2007, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:08:19 +0100 > > Adam Tkac <atkac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But I know really better > > workflows which cannot be used with CVS. > > Can you outline what kind of better workflow you'd like to see? Afaik, git and hg (and maybe other modern vcs) would make comaintaining packages a lot easier, because the comaintainer can work on their copy of a package and then submit it to the main maintainer and then the main maintainer can verify it and commit it to the official repository, where packages are built from. Also it would be nice, if it was easier to sync branches in the vcs or only use one branch for all stable distributions or even all, when there is no need for several branches. E.g. many of my packages use identical specs for all branches, because the packages are so simple, that there are no big changes between new releases. Or changes that may break a lot. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
