On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 13:16 +0100, Adam Tkac wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:06:26AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:08:19 +0100 > > Adam Tkac <atkac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > But I know really better > > > workflows which cannot be used with CVS. > > > > Can you outline what kind of better workflow you'd like to see? > > I wrote it in previous mail. I like distributed VCS workflow - local > repository, local braches, local commits etc. Is that useful with the centralised tasks that distribution building requires, such as koji? On the Samba team we are presented with a very similar issue - distributed VCS systems are very attractive, but we also do a lot of our QA with a central build farm, which realistically only works for the centralised modal. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
