Re: common-lisp-controller for Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anthony Green <green <at> redhat.com> writes:
> I've created a draft Feature page on the wiki to copy Debian's 
> common-lisp-controller package and methodology for installing Common 
> Lisp implementations and libraries.

How does this fit together with natively-compiled implementations like gcl? 
Does this imply radically changing them to work more like an interpreter and 
load natively-compiled versions as shared libraries like what was done to GCJ? 
If it does, who is going to do the work? And is this really a good idea? For 
what it's worth, Maxima seems to cope just fine with the current 
implementation.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux