Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >>> >>>> Jon Ciesla wrote: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>> Re-tag in f-8 with "TAG_OPTS=-F make tag", should fix it. Should be >>>>> OK >>>>> since youve got the f9 tag in devel already. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Like this? >>>> >>>> TAG_OPTS=-F make tag >>>> cvs tag -F -c uncrustify-0_40-1_fc8 >>>> ERROR: The tag uncrustify-0_40-1_fc8 is already applied on a different >>>> branch >>>> ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches >>> >>> See message on updating common. . .:) >>> >> Are you sure about this? I think the problem is that the tag was already >> (mistakenly) applied to devel. Probably because I did the tag in devel >> before discovering that I needed to update common. > > That's true. The old common is what caused the invalid fc8 tag to appear > in devel, and the tag -F should have fixed it, I've never had that not > work. > >> AFAICT, the only workaround is just bump to 0_40-2. That's what I did, >> now >> it's building. > > Will you be bumping and rebuilding devel also, to avoid an EVR problem? > I didn't know there would be a problem. Can I find an description of this problem somewhere? Do you mean that the 0_40-2_fc8 would appear to be newer than the 0_40-1_fc9? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
