On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:07:12 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > The upgrade path ends with: > > > > ... F8 + F8 updates + F8 updates-testing --> rawhide > > > > An EVR upgrade in F8 updates-testing can only break the path to > > rawhide, not the path to older dists. > > Here is an example from the report: > Zim > F7-updates-testing > F8 (0:0.21-1.fc7 > 0:0.19-1.fc7) > Zim-0.21-1.fc7 is in F7 updates-testing but the version in F8 is older. Btw. > there is already a request to add Zim-0.21-1.fc8 to F8 updates-testing. Yes, but if you only repeat Roland McGrath's request, that one has been noticed. Perhaps bodhi already offers an interface where to retrieve a list of pending push requests. Perhaps it doesn't yet. It's not too long before F8 updates-testing will be opened, and then push requests will be processed frequently again and won't sit in pending for a long time. > It seemed to me, that we discuss here, how we would like the script to behave. > Btw. imho there should be a warning when a stable package in F7 is evr-higher > than a stable package in F8, even when there is a newer package in > F8-updates-testing. And other maintainers disagree, because as soon as they've pushed an update to "F8 updates-testing", they don't want to the receive a mail that tells them that the pkg in "F7 updates" is still newer than "F8 updates". -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
