Christopher Stone wrote:
On 10/31/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Christopher Stone wrote:
On 10/31/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It would be fantastic if the backend was more neutral like you said
since there are people who might want to run any display manager with
any desktop environment. Meanwhile, throwing around accusations instead
of looking at what KDE maintainers as well as users want in Fedora is
counter productive. Just a while back I was accused of having an agenda
against KDE [1]. Now I get accused of having an agenda towards KDE [2].
I guess, the next one to follow would be XFCE [3]. Others would accuse
Red Hat of crippling KDE and the routine will continue. Next time,
don't wonder why.
Rahul
[1]https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-games-list/2007-September/msg00047.html
[2]https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg02680.html
[3]http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/XfceLive
While I agree with what you have said in this thread, I certainly got
the impression you were doing everything within your means to avoid
having any kde games in the games spin. I really don't know why you
brought that up here, if you want to continue the discussion about the
games spin, please add to the thread on the games list or in private
with me. Thank you. Sheesh.
I am uninterested in that discussion again. Generally people could be
more courteous instead of throwing around accusations of bias without
understanding the factors involved. We can do better.
I still do not understand why you brought it up again in this thread
especially in light of the fact that you are not interested in it.
To make another related point. Nothing personal with you.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
