On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 08:18 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 13:58 -0600, Trever L. Adams wrote: > Neither of them work good enough yet. One works on some cards the other > on other cards, one support dual-head, the other not so much etc.. > > So yes your sample set of one is enough for us to base all our future > decisions on. > > Thanks, > Dave. > Actually, sample set of more than one. I have two machines I directly maintain that use the RadeonHD where Avivo was garbage. Additionally, there are others I help maintain or advise on. Also, I don't think Avivo should be discarded yet, though from reading around, it is going to be a dead end, supposedly. But, RadeonHD shouldn't be left out either. Just because I didn't give my sample size (which the above is as close as you will get as I cannot give specifics, for privacy reasons, of many machines I work with/on), doesn't mean I am some brain-dead "me too" or "your dumb" person. Thank you, Trever -- "The hands that help are better far than the lips that pray." -- Robert G. Ingersoll
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
