Re: Package XYZ is not signed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2007, 19:25 +0100 schrieb nodata:
> Am Sonntag, den 28.10.2007, 13:40 -0700 schrieb Andrew Farris:
> > If you keep an eye on where your packages are coming from, even for rawhide,
> > then you can be sure that only authorized maintainers have put them into the
> > system (control which mirrors you're pulling them from).  Actually signing the
> > package from the build system would change very little other than insure that
> > the mirror you're downloading from did not bring in a new package that doesn't
> > belong.
> 
> It worries me massively, from a security perspective, that someone from
> inside Red Hat would say something as wrong as this.

Oh, you don't work for Red Hat. Sorry. But your statement is still
completely off the field.

> > 
> > So as it stands, you have to extend trust to the maintainers, and the mirror.
> > You can pick which mirror you trust.
> > 
> 

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux