Re: Packaging httrack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mo Oktober 29 2007, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote:
> I am trying to package HTTrack (http://www.httrack.com/) for Fedora.
> Among other things, its upstream versioning is a kind of strange. eg.,
> the versions are 3.41 -> 3.41-2 -> 3.41-3 and so on. See
> http://www.httrack.com/page/4/en/index.html
>
> So what should be the Fedora NEVRA? Would httrack-3.41.3-1 be fine?

Maybe you can convince upstream to use an "_" instead of an "-" in this 
version string. httrack also uses a versionid, which does not include a "-", 
e.g. httrack 3.41-3 is the same as httrack 3.41.22.

Regards,
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux