On Mo Oktober 29 2007, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote: > I am trying to package HTTrack (http://www.httrack.com/) for Fedora. > Among other things, its upstream versioning is a kind of strange. eg., > the versions are 3.41 -> 3.41-2 -> 3.41-3 and so on. See > http://www.httrack.com/page/4/en/index.html > > So what should be the Fedora NEVRA? Would httrack-3.41.3-1 be fine? Maybe you can convince upstream to use an "_" instead of an "-" in this version string. httrack also uses a versionid, which does not include a "-", e.g. httrack 3.41-3 is the same as httrack 3.41.22. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
