On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 13:47 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le Lun 29 octobre 2007 13:30, Florian La Roche a écrit : > > Hi, > > > here the output of a test script that checks all rpm packages > > for dangling symlinks. It does not look at an installed system, > > but only at files included within rpm packages, so there are > > a few false reports here for files/dirs created within scripts. > > For each package the correct way to test would be to create a fake > root with all package deps installed and check if there are dangling > symlinks then. It looks like quite a few of your "problem" link > targets are provided by packages the "problem" package depends on. > > (some of them will break over time BTW, for example dejavu ttf file > naming changed with last release) > > The sane thing would probably be to require that packages that have > links pointing outside the package itself add a file dep to the > link(s) target(s), but I'm sure proponents of "yum update speed first, > correctness later" will object loudly. Does rpmlint inform about links pointing outside the package ? That would be useful. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
