Re: Package XYZ is not signed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On So Oktober 28 2007, Andrew Farris wrote:

> prevent that either (in rawhide).  Testing rawhide isn't for boxes with
> corporate sensitive data...

This seems not to be common knowledge, because afaik even Fedora Maintainers 
use Rawhide on a system, where they create new packages.

> Actually signing the package from the build system would change very little
> other than insure that the mirror you're downloading from did not bring in
> a new package that doesn't belong.

Imho it is a big benefit, because it is very easy for a mirror maintainer to 
change a package. Also someone who breaks into a mirror can easily cause 
heavy damage. And last but not least, the manipulation of the package can 
also happen on the connection to the mirror, e.g. on conferences with 
free/open wifi/internet access.

Regards,
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux