Re: Should we settle on one SSL implementation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Steve Grubb wrote:

> During F9, there will be another parallel and somewhat related project to hunt
> down places where md-5 and sha-1 are being used and look at improving the
> situation so that sha-256, and in some cases other hash algorithms, could be
> used.

Also, as Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> reminded me:

	SHA256 is slower, and there are no hardware accelerators for it.
	(while, I think, VIA supports SHA1 acceleration?)
	If you want to switch, a switch to accelerated AES-XCBC would be a
	better choice, I think.  Or, AES-GCM mode, which hashes and encrypts in
	one step.

Paul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux