On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:01:31 +0100 "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Merely reporting rpmlint output after every build isn't going to be > too scalable, because there can be alot of noise in its output. What > we really need is to compare the new rpmlint output to the rpmlint > output of the previous build in that build target. So that we only > see 'differences' & thus can easily spot regressions. You can extend > this to other RPM semantics comparisons beyond just rpmlints, so we > can do better at spotting regressions in Fedora updates automatically. And would we call this magical thing "rpmdiff" 'cause that would be awesome... If only there were some opensource software that did this. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
