Re: Should we settle on one SSL implementation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 14:32:59 -0400,
  Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Uh?  I wasn't aware SHA1 has been broken (at least, not in
> a practically exploitable way).

Schneier has written some blog entries related to sha1 and the process for
getting a new has standard.

http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/08/new_cryptanalyt.html
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/nist_hash_works_2.html
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/09/notes_from_the.html

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux