Re: Package XYZ is not signed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/25/07, Will Woods <wwoods@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 20:48 -0400, yonas Abraham wrote:
> > yum update fedora-release-notes
> >
> > produce
> >
> > Package fedora-release-notes-8.0.0-2.noarch.rpm is not signed
> >
> >
> > this is true for about 16 pakages on my Rahwid system today
>
> This has been discussed a bunch of times already. Rawhide packages
> aren't signed. This is intentional. Until we hit the final release,
> either:
>
> 1) disable 'fedora' and 'updates' repositories, and re-enable
> 'development'
> - this is best if you're planning to follow rawhide in the future
>
> or:
>
> 2) disable 'gpgcheck' for 'fedora'
> - you need to remember to re-enable it when Fedora 8 is released!
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> -w

Thanks, I was not aware that my machine switched to "Fedora release 8
(Werewolf)". I am back to rawhide now and every thing is good now.

/Yonas

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux