2007/10/25, Rudolf Kastl <che666@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2007/10/25, Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > Yo, > > > > Rather than sleeping, I was just looking at a few capabilities currently > > in F8 and thinking about what would be nice in the future. > > > > Unless I'm missing something, GNOME's nautilus (GNOME VFS) doesn't seem > > to understand ACLs. Am I missing something? Heck, I remember 5 or 6 > > years ago patching in the original ACL patches from bestbits and even > > setting ACLs remotely from a Windows machine using Samba, by right > > clicking on the export files. Does this not work in nautilus? > > > > Jon. > > > > With the current broken default permission tab you cant even set > standard permissions like sticky bit, sgid, suid which is > clearly a regression, so why do you expect acls or even extended ext3 > attributes would be shown or handled? ;) > There is a user unfriendly way of enabling the old permssion tab with > some magic gconf key... (very user friendly indeed). > > regards, > Rudolf Kastl > > > > > > -- > > fedora-devel-list mailing list > > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > > > fixed a small confusing "typo" in the text above ;) regards, Rudolf Kastl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
