Re: Mass Branching for F-8 (round 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:51:09 +0100
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Well the pkgdb part of this seems to have gone wrong for *all* the
> lvm-team-owned projects, unfortunately.
> 
> Specifically, the Fedora 7 permissions were not copied across to the
> new Fedora 8 correctly:
> 
>   lvm2 and device-mapper: mostly cloned OK, but 2 users were not
> granted "commit" access for F8, although they have it for the other
> collections. When I try to grant this manually, I get the error
> "<number> is not in a group that is allowed to hold the commit acl".
> Yet of course they hold the commit acl elsewhere.
> 
>   dmraid and device-mapper-multipath: only *one* user was given
> access to F8 (watchcommits and commit).  Nobody has "approveacls" so
> we cannot even attempt to fix this ourselves.
>  
> What quality assurance was performed on this data edit?  Why didn't
> the scripts performing the change flag up any errors?  And what about
> checking the results of a major data edit like this for
> inconsistencies afterwards: Were any other packages affected
> similarly?


The script showed the errors for your packages and I passed those on to
Toshio for hand fixing.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux