Re: multiarch header file wrappers and ARM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:46:13PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:

> > On ARM, the preprocessor symbol __arm__ is defined, and %{_arch} is
> > set to 'arm', so something like this will work:
> > 
> > #if defined(__i386__)
> > #include "blkid_types-i386.h"
> > +#elif defined(__arm__)
> > +#include "blkid_types-arm.h"
> > #elif defined(__ia64__)
> > #include "blkid_types-ia64.h"
> > #elif defined(__powerpc64__)
> > 
> > If you have such a construct in your package, please consider adding
> > the relevant __arm__ bits.
> 
> Is arm even capable of multilib'ing?

Nope.


> If not, why even bother with hacks like this?

Some packages, like apr, only substitute a wrapper header when the
package is built for a multilib arch, but other packages, like gmp,
substitute this header all the time.

So, yes, another solution would be to do it like apr and only
substitute on a multilib arch.  That would solve it as well.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux