Re: Should we settle on one SSL implementation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 16:11 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> 
> Well for that matter GLibC itself has MD5 in it....

Quick! Make it depend on NSS! :-)

/simo with 3 packages with the same bug filed I can't possibly fix as
NSS simply do not have the relevant algorithms ...

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux