On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:42:14PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 15:38 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 02:13:18PM +0000, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 09:11 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > John Dennis wrote: > > > > > > > > > So why did Peter Vrabec open bugs against a slew of packages a few hours > > > > > ago all with the summary: > > > > > > > > > > "Port XXX to use NSS library for cryptography" > > > > > > > > > > I haven't seen a consensus this how package maintainers should be > > > > > spending their time. > > > > > > > > I'm assuming those bugs are mostly for tracking purposes. > > > > > > > > > > and a lot of them are wrong. > > > > Yep, this is just creating yet bug triage work for maintainers. When entering > > tickets one could at least check the app in question to see if it actually > > uses the crypto libraries we're being told to remove. Not useful. > > Not only crypto libraries but built-in code as well. I have checked that > the packages actually contain the code. Clearly not. Virt-manager does not make use of OpenSSL, NSS or GNU TLS, nor any other random crypto routines & yet a bug was still filed. Now Python and GTK do have this stuff and virt-manager uses Python & GTK, but it is not useful to file bugs against every app which uses Python or GTK when you could file one bug against Python or GTK themselves. Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
