On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 04:45:46PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:27:53PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > just a few questions: > > > > 1) What is your opinion on packaging libcurl separately (read independently on curl)? > > For references: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2004-09/0095.html > > That would make a lot of sense to me. For me as well. The problem is that after moving libs from curl to libcurl, curl will turn into non-multilib package, what may break upgrade path. I'm not sure whether yum is able to cope with that these days, but it didn't recently. If yes, I can commit the curl/libcurl split just now. > > > 2) How about compat-libcurl or libcurl3, libcurl4 packages to let users run third > > party software independently on the libcurl version in the distribution? > > If there is a real demand for that, indeed, but not for fedora packages > (though this is what is implied by your wording). > Well, I saw no real demand for it, I just asked to get a feedback whether there is or isn't any ;-) Jindrich -- Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
