Re: Some thoughts about firmware inclusion.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Mar 23 octobre 2007 02:39, Ian Chapman a écrit :
> Adam Jackson wrote:
>
>> This is not the same thing as a firmware, because firmware doesn't
>> execute on the host CPU.  Practically speaking, that's where we draw
>> the
>> line.
>
> This is not meant as a facetious question but how does this pan out
> with
> regards to emulators? Most of which require some sort of firmware
> which
> runs on the 'virtual' CPU which is technically speaking running on the
> real CPU, perhaps even more so in cases where JIT compilation is used.

That probably means you need to package "firmware" building tools in
fedora and use them to build the "firmware" source in the "firmware"
package. And we may have been lax on the subject in the past for games
but as the OP message shows it's a quick path to shipping pre-built
closed java or.Net binaries and effectively having a non-free system.

Bootstrapping may be needed as in every language we've merged.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux