Re: Some thoughts about firmware inclusion.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 10:06 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On a tangent, I would like to have a discussion about in-kernel firmware
> as it becomes split out and loaded using request_firmware. So that third
> parties can supply different firmware updates, can we agree that it's
> worthwhile having one firmware package for each firmware file set needed
> by the kernel package, in the longer term?

This is fine (well, not for F8 obviously, but we can make it okay for
F9), with a few caveats:
1) The module *MUST* have the needed firmware tagged appropriately so
that we can figure out what firmware to pull into initrds, the
installer, etc
2) We should probably follow the path being blazed with wireless
firmware where we include the multiple, incompatible firmware versions
in one package.  Otherwise, the fact that multiple kernels can be
installed leads to a a bit of a quagmire
3) Care needs to be taken so that upgrades will work correctly once the
firmware has moved.  A requires is one answer, and maybe the best, but
there definitely needs to be some thought

Jeremy

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux