On 10/21/07, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 20:04 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > > On 10/21/07, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 09:01 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > > > > On 10/20/07, Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > > > > And I'm afraid this does apply to you, Christopher, I should have > > > > > > looked more closely. If for example you diff > > > > > > classcal3d_1_1RefCounted.html between x86_64 and x86, you'll see > > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > (pseudodiff): > > > > > > > > > > > > -<a class="anchor" name="fe153da64cbdd43c0ab660327001a25e"></a> > > > > > > +<a class="anchor" name="23e13384bbde2cbd2f302e6ad70eae2b"></a> > > > > > > > > > > Could docs like this be split out into noarch subpackages? Or perhaps > > > > > pre-generated and then installed from a Source1: line so that they'd > > > > > match across arches? > > > > > > > > Wow, please don't ask me to do this, the bug is clearly yum or doxygen. > > > > > > rpmlib is complaining about the files not matching. Not yum. And I > > > actually don't think this is a bug in rpm, either. > > > > Except for the fact that you can install both arches just fine using > > rpm, but it fails with yum. > > really? That's interesting. It should be consistent b/c at the point > where the error is coming from in yum, all of the operation is inisde > rpmlib. yep, rpm -ivh cal3d-devel-0.11.0-5.fc8.x86_64.rpm cal3d-devel-0.11.0-5.fc8.i386.rpm works like a charm. not so well using yum localinstall... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
