Christopher Stone píše v Pá 19. 10. 2007 v 15:02 -0700: > I am getting a multiarch conflict on %doc files in a devel > subpackage[1]. Are we supposed to avoid %doc files in devel packages > for multiarch purposes, or am I doing something wrong in my spec, or > is this a multiarch rpm bug? I have similar problem on a subpackage, which contains additional plugins + their resources [1]. The main source package (codeblocks) is divided into 4 binary subpackages - codeblocks - main executable, default plugins + their resources - codeblocks-libs - shared libraries for the main executable and plugins - codeblocks-devel - devel libraries and headers - codeblocks-contrib - additional plugins + their resources The resources are packed from source files with zip during building of the package. The -devel and -libs subpackage are multiarch aware AFAIK [2], but there is no reason to install both 32 and 64 bit version of the main subpackage and the -contrib subpackage. Does anybody see a way, how to fix this, when creating noarch subpackages for an arch package is not possible? Thanks Dan [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=340911 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228356 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
