Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 10:31 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:07:23 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 22:58 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: >>>> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:18:15 -0500 >>>> Eric Sandeen <sandeen redhat com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You could probably just add a patch to modify the shipped >>>>> docs/api_footer.html file to remove the timestamp? >>>> Are these docs generated at build time? If so the timestamps will >>>> still differ and conflict. >>> Does rpm complain about differing timestamps on files, while the >>> contents is identical? >> Eric refers to timestamps _in_ the files, however. > That was clear. He used doxygen's textual timestamps as example. > > I was referring to filesystem timestamps (stat(2)). They will differ on > generated files in a multiarch'ed setup even if "textual timestamps" > have been filtered/removed. Anyway, I think the answer is: RPM won't complain at install time, near as I can tell, but if you do rpm -V later you'll see "T" (mtime mismatch) flags. ...and from elsewhere in the thread, unless you install carefully (install -p) it's not just generated files that'll mismatch but even header files that were copied into a devel rpm. -Eric -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
