On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 10:24 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > The rel-eng team in conjunction with FESCo has developed a proposal for > changing the development cycle of Fedora. The goals are to disrupt > development less frequently, make it easier for maintainers to get > fixes in, and make it easier for future work to happen without risking > disruption of a release in progress. My number one pet peeve with how Fedora development works is that there's no equivalent of the "testing" Debian release. It's one of the things that I *really* think they get right, and we don't. Personally, I'd bite the bullet and adopt an interim release methodology so there's always a week-two week lag behind "known good" base platform that can be used to do most package tests without worrying something unrelated has broken today, or the whole thing won't install, or... But that's just me ;-) Jon. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
