Re: Provides/Obsoletes question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:35:25 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:

> In RHEL5 (probably also in Fedora), pidgin obsoletes "gaim < 999:1"
> (epoch 999 !!!).  If someone can explain me why this is better than
> just obsoleting "gaim", please tell me.  IMHO, this only makes sense
> if a "gaim >= 999:1" might ever exist.  I don't think so :-).

Versioned Obsoletes are superior, because they occupy only a specific
EVR range of a package namespace. For your example of "gaim < 999:1",
you can reintroduce a package with the name "gaim" (suppose it's a
different piece of software) by giving it an EVR higher than 999:1.
On the contrary, the unversioned "Obsoletes: gaim" blocks re-entry
of a package with the name "gaim", regardless of its EVR.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux