Le mardi 16 octobre 2007 à 19:45 +0200, Hans de Goede a écrit : > Jesse Keating wrote: > > Here is the problem, if the build is not deemed "good" by rel-eng to be > > in the release after the release candidate where does it go? > > Why does this deeming good have to be done by rel-eng? Thats creating both a > bottle-neck and a hoop to jump through. Because ultimately rel-eng is the Fedora entity responsible for making good releases, because everyone will blame them if things go wrong, so I sure hope they have veto power at critical release time > And yes I want to see "benign simple fixes, with little chance to regressions" > go into the release even once we've released an RC, that way we the actual > release will be better (less bugs) and we avoid having a slew of updates right > after the release. Join rel-eng, you want a share of the power, get a share of the blame. > I know some people are very much against this and want only critical fixes at > this point, to them I say stop thinking Fedora Core and start thinking Fedora > Extras. This is not FE vs FC, this is having someone in charge at release time and you won't find a lot of people here to say rel-eng or Jesse is abusing this power. Many thanks to the rel-eng team! Many thanks for herding ungrateful cats! -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
