Re: If you are maintinaing of developing a Fedora Package.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Mar 16 octobre 2007 11:12, Tomas Mraz a écrit :
>
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 10:59 +0200, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
>> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 23:31 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
>> >  Couldn't be better to maintain default selinux labels like others
>> >  file attributes?
>> >
>> >      %attr(4755,root,root) %selinux(foo_t)  /bin/foo
>>
>> I was thinking many times why don't we already do it this way. Much
>> more
>> elegant and maintainable than restorecon in scriptlets.
> And how does that take care of updating file_contexts so the labels
> are not lost on the next filesystem relabel?

>From a packager POW, ideally rpm would turn %selinux spec annotations
in a selinux policy file installed at the right place so relabel
works. That's plumbing your typical packager wants no part of.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux