On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:41 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 09:15 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 20:18 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > > > Ah and btw if someone can check what is the GNOME status wrt this it > > > > would be nice. Nautilus uses libsmbclient as well. > > > > > > I'm no expert on GNOME stuff but I thought it does so through gnome-vfs. > > > > > > gnome-vfs2.spec has: > > > License: LGPLv2 and LGPL+ and GPL+ > > > # the daemon and the library are LGPLv2 > > > # the modules are LGPL+ and GPL+ > > > > > > libsmbclient is used in modules/smb-method.c, which carries a GPLv2+ notice. > > > (Dunno if omission of GPLv2+ qualifies as a bug in gnome-vfs2's License tag.) > > > > Furthermore, the smb module is run in the daemon, so the license of it > > doesn't affect applications linking to gnome-vfs. > > This is interesting, to be sure we should evaluate though if there is > intimate communication and sharing of data structures between the daemon > and the client, but things looks much better in the GNOME camp. It just uses the standard way to put gnome-vfs modules in the daemon. Nothing is specific to the smb backend. In fact, any backend can be put in the daemonb by adding [daemon] to the module config file. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
