On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Dave Jones wrote: > Doesn't ring any bells. If the attribution of "safer" was something I > said, I'm not entirely sure what I was thinking at the time. No, you didn't say it. I sent you the email privately where I answered all the concerns people made in the 'ntfs kernel module' thread you also commented: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-October/thread.html#00596 Since it was a longer email, I put it here: http://ntfs-3g.org/docs/ntfs-kernel-module-2006-10-23.txt Please note, that at that time there was no ntfs-3g web site, documents and the situation was indeed confusing for users, that's why I summarised things for the interested Fedora users. But my email came back when I tried to send it to the list unsubscribed. I'm also always busy and get insane amount of emails and didn't have time to subscribe/wait/configure list filtering, etc, so I decided to send the email only to you, mentioning the potential kernel driver bugs (which I would have detail if there were interest). Thank you for the replies. Regards, Szaka -- NTFS-3G Lead Developer: http://ntfs-3g.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
